127 Comments
Feb 27ยทedited Feb 27Liked by Christopher Cook

I'll take capitalism over any other "ism" any day. At least in that system, I have a chance to support myself in the manner I choose. Capitalism looks like a failed system until you realize it has been corrupted to the point of becoming more socialist. That is the greedy, arrogant few stealing all the wealth. Materialism is a disease that feeds upon itself if you do not have limits. If the last thing didn't do it for you, it's doubtful that the next thing will.

Expand full comment
Feb 28Liked by Christopher Cook

I only own a handful of things that are of import. My small library of indie books, my laptop, and my clothes. I only replace things when they've broken and I can't fix them. When I get my car paid for, I'll own it for the next 20 years, if not longer.

There aren't many things I want, or need.

Expand full comment
Feb 28Liked by Christopher Cook

This an excellent piece, and I agree with your assessments across the board.

As to this line...

"Markets come in two flavors: those that are regulated and controlled by a central power, and those that arenโ€™t."

I would say that any time you have a fiat, usury-based currency, controlled by central bankers? That is the very definition of the first 'flavor.'

Thus, we have not had true 'capitalism' here in America since 1913. Humble opinion, natch...

Expand full comment

Anyone who believes that Capitalism is in and of itself bad, or worse than Socialism and or Communism, needs to watch Milton Friedman and Prager U videos on the subject. But they probably wonโ€™t! ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ™

Expand full comment

I think I can tell when the attempt at consciousness shift began. This was where I noticed it in my life. It was when Hollyweird turned "Greed is Good" into a mantra. Followed by the Kartrashian entrance and the onset of "Reality teevee". This was ALL about product placement. Shallow vlalues and ignorance went from there.

Expand full comment
Feb 27Liked by Christopher Cook

There's no such thing as capitalism it has never existed it does not exist it never will exist you can't have capitalism if you have a central bank you can't have capitalism if you have public property you can't have capitalism if you have public schools you can have capitalism if you have tariffs you can't have capitalism if you have borders you can't have capitalism if you have regulations you can't have capitalism if you have traffic laws you can't have capitalism if you have a so-called income tax there's probably another million reasons good luck with that. Capitalism is like Sasquatch it's everywhere and nowhere at the same time

Expand full comment
Feb 27Liked by Christopher Cook

We absolutely can, if we want, stop buying things. To say you canโ€™t, is saying you have no control over your life. Some people like to be told what to do all of the time. My family isnโ€™t that type. We only buy when we need, and then only after finding the best deal available.

Expand full comment

Monsters yesterday. And yesterday, today. We seem to be thinking along parallel lines. Your well thought out ideas pair well with my wtf was that thinking โค๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ป

Expand full comment
Feb 29Liked by Christopher Cook

Maybe watching Adam Curtis' "Century of the Self" would give you food for thought. Pretending this is all one side or the other is far too glib a response. Yes, we have personal responsibility. But to view it as solely that is letting the power structure and their huge expenditure to create and develop want in us is leting them off the hook, and also ignoring the actual historical record.

Any discussion of how we consume that ignores the work of Gustav Le Bon or Edward Bernays is sadly missing the mark by quite some margin.

Expand full comment

Yes but you see and we all see, indeed we must be controlled it seems. Morality, Community, Family, Fathers, reputation, religion, personal violence between men over Honor, the sense of something sacred all held us in โ€œFreedomโ€ from Force, always the last resort. Laws and Force should be the penultimate means , Force ultima ratioโ€ฆ

โ€ฆ except if everything, certainly every American mainstream church for example is for sale..

โ€ฆ then force it isโ€ฆ

You may say count me out if youโ€™ll restrict human freedomโ€ฆ

Oh very well, the people see chaos and will demand order, and theyโ€™ll get it. This being usually how democracy ends, and here we areโ€ฆ crying for a Caesar, so desperate we paint his face on a PT Barnum , aka Orange Man.

A proper one will come to follow our comic Gracchus.

As for the market and its amorality, it seems weโ€™ve had enough of that too.

Amorality it seems is not enough.

Here is your market value;

Mene , Mekel, Tekel <

Parsin. Weighed in the balance and found wanting.

Expand full comment
Feb 28Liked by Christopher Cook

The Shattering

It has begun

The smashing of old paradigms

Some that have been the foundation

For hundreds of years

Others that have held

For thousands of years

are being challenged

To prove they have any value at all

Or are they just chains

That many have proudly worn

For so many lifetimes

But we cannot fall back 12 thousand years

New paradigms cry out to be born

It is now

The Shattering

The Rebirth

Expand full comment

Materialism is part of the search for happiness. That's how I see it and always have. The right to life, liberty and what was termed happiness is in many places been interpreted to mean property. And it is a PURSUIT. Most folks who gain much riches find that it didn't make them happy. So then they turn to the sordid pursuits. I know that if I were as rich as someone like Elon Musk, I'd have a full time job being a guy who would give gifts to people like walk up when I saw a family buying groceries in Walmart, pay their grocery bill. I've done that in restaurants. Saw a family sitting there with a few children and paid their bill for them and they never new it until they went to check out. It's actually fun and makes me happy.

Expand full comment

This is a simple and elegantly argued takedown of castigating K-isms critics. But we live in such a moralistic society for literally everything, it stands to reason that people will put a moral judgement on our materialism. But in every case, where there is economic freedom, social freedom and freedom from government follows. So people who value centralized planning and power (to create utopia) will naturally push the belief that a free market is to be treated with disdain.

Expand full comment

Read the original Free Market works. It assumes that it is immoral to place borders on movements of people. Immoral to stop the importation of goods, or the exportation of factories. Immoral to stop monopolies. Immoral to stop anything that would hinder the businessman from making the most money - capitalism.

So, what would you do if your freedom means you donโ€™t have any choices BUT to buy the cheap plastic goods, with whatever wages you can earn, with whatever job is left over after they deported all the factories to overseas and imported all the cheap labor they could?

This is all in Adam Smith and Ricardo. Itโ€™s ALL RIGHT THERE in the founding stuff, and it WRECKED revolutionary France, causing multiple bread riots.

So, when China starts enacting bans against high frequency trading at the beginning and end of the day, and putting limits on short sellingโ€ฆ With the point to limit how much market makers with AI can screw over the plebsโ€ฆ And people with Capitalism!(TM) yay! in their heads start screaming about how China is communistโ€ฆ

I just scratch my head and wonder what planet theyโ€™re on, when China isnโ€™t communist, and is just trying to look out for their common man as far as I can tell. With -regulated- markets.

Expand full comment
Feb 27Liked by Christopher Cook

Technology is an expression of our human-predator agency; we enjoy, we destroy. Not guilt-tripping. We like comfort & we like things that make our lives more enjoyable & meaningful.

Expand full comment
Feb 27ยทedited Feb 27Liked by Christopher Cook

"...this argument is really saying is that freedom and political equality are to blame..."

In a 2021 survey one-third of Democratic voters (34%) said Americans have โ€œtoo much freedom.โ€

But leftists don't believe that per se. They claim that as a reason to take away more of our freedom, and have more control over us.

Expand full comment