Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chris Rivet's avatar

I recently wrote a post that claims conspiracy theorists are the only real scientists, according to the definition of science:

https://chrisrivet.substack.com/p/steam-rolled

WTC building 7 just really got me started, and I think it would for most people, but few revisit the idea. Realizing that if that building was a controlled demolition, which takes weeks/months of planning and preparation, then the whole thing had to be orchestrated because why would you just have some building set with explosives sitting around for the off chance for something to happen nearby and then blame it on. But then why would they film it, because it was so obviously a demolition? Was it all just to continuously confuse the public? I don't know how many chess moves ahead they are and that's the terrifying part.

Frater Seamus's avatar

Great post! This is a conundrum I myself have struggled with quite a bit since we seemingly entered 'the upside down'. It really has come to the point where so much gaslighting and outright lying has been perpetrated by not only corporate media, but bad actors in the independent space as well. I think your best defence is to sample from a wide variety of sources and use your intuition. Generally when there is a variety of viewpoints on an issue the truth lies somewhere in the middle; not always, but often enough. It really comes down to doing your homework, digging deep and developing a keen instinct for sniffing out misdirection and obfuscations.

72 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?