EXT. CAFE – DAY
ROBERT, a pharmaceutical executive and CHARLES, a major player in a global “economic forum” organization enjoy a lunch of canapés and Cristal mimosas on a veranda cafe in Monaco, overlooking the sparkling Mediterranean.
ROBERT
(concerned)
Listen Chuck, I’m starting to get a little worried. People are starting to figure out that ivermectin really works against covid.
CHARLES
(laughing)
Don’t sweat it, my friend—we’ve made it nearly impossible for people to get it. And anyone who even mentions it is treated like an idiotic conspiracy theorist. We’ve got the average person throwing around the phrase “horse paste” like trained seals.
ROBERT
Right, but you promised me I’d be making more money off this. I mean, I appreciate the 26 billion I’ve raked in so far, but…
CHARLES
I hear ya, buddy. Okay, how about this. Come up with something that is just like ivermectin, slap your company name on it, and market that. We’ll make sure that all the right people say that it’s different and better. If any scientists or doctors figure out the truth, we’ll make them look like cranks.
ROBERT
(smiling)
Right—a protease inhibitor. Great idea, Chuck. And we’ll throw in a creepy AIDS drug, so that while it’s working, it’s also giving some people a lot of long-term side effects.
CHARLES
Perfect. They’ll get sick down the road, and they’ll have no clue where it came from. I am glad to see you share our views on overpopulation.
ROBERT
Okay, but then how do we know that people will buy it?
CHARLES
Same way we did with the vaccine. It’s an “emergency,” remember? We can force everyone to pay for it through taxes. Then we’ll give it away for “free” and look like heroes!
ROBERT
(laughing open-mouthed, revealing half-chewed canapé)
I LOVE IT!
CHARLES
Come up up with a plan and then swing by my house next month. That way, me, Heinrich, and the rest of the gang can all sign off on it at the same time.
ROBERT
Which house?
CHARLES
(laughing)
Oh. that’s right, I forgot…I have eleven houses!
Both men laugh vigorously and drain their glasses of Cristal.
#####################
I am just going to come out and say it:
The world is run by psychopaths and people who repeat, believe, and enforce the lies of psychopaths.
Today’s little one-scene play is a followup from yesterday’s article, in which we discuss a case-study example of ivermectin’s off-label effectiveness in treating covid19.
The patient in question in yesterday’s account was, of course, prescribed Paxlovid to treat the covid. Unsurprisingly, the doctor heard the word “ivermectin” and freaked out, scolding the patient and the patient’s advocate as if they were disobedient, mentally challenged children. (Remember…psychopaths and people who repeat, believe, and enforce the lies of psychopaths.)
Ivermectin is a protease inhibitor with a strong and growing track record in treating covid 19. It is safe, well tolerated, and has a long history of use throughout the world. How do I know it is a protease inhibitor? Because I can read.1 Paxlovid is also a protease inhibitor, mixed with an HIV drug. It has a list of side effects and problematic drug interactions as long as your arm. And its actual effectiveness is very much in question2
And yet, if you do a web search for “ivermectin protease inhibitor” or similar search strings, the top results are primarily websites reinforcing the narrative:
Ivermectin and Paxlovid aren’t the same.
Ivermectin doesn’t work.
The people who are calling Paxlovid “Pfizermectin” are fascist racist Nazi racist fascists.
It is true that ivermectin and Paxlovid aren’t exactly the same. And thank God, because ivermectin works, whereas, based on the list of side effects and interactions, Paxlovid may be rather toxic stuff. But when Paxlovid came out and a bunch of people called it “Pfizermectin,” they were, in essence, correct. What they were saying is this:
Here we have ivermectin—a safe, proven protease inhibitor with an off-label use in effectively treating covid. The powers that be malign it, say it is dangerous, prevent people from getting it, and convince the majority that a drug that has been given to four billion humans worldwide is, in fact, only for animals.
Then, the powers that be (yes, I am lumping them all together on purpose) release a similar drug (though unproved and potentially much more dangerous) and force taxpayers to pay for it, so it can be given for “free.”
Then, the powers that be say that they didn’t just do what we all just saw them do.
For those of you who may have already taken Paxlovid, I am very sorry. I am sorry both for the fact that you took it, and for the fact that this article may be triggering to anyone who did. I do not mean it that way. I hope that the long list of side effects do not impact you, or anyone. I hope that Pfizer’s recent record of producing toxic drugs (and then getting governments to force people to take them) does not mean that Paxlovid will have the same long-term risks as Pfizer’s (and others’) mRNA vaccines. I hope, but I also fear that it will, based on that track record.
For your future health and safety, I recommend that you adopt the aforementioned statement as part of a heuristic for judging EVERYTHING you hear:
The world is run by psychopaths and people who repeat, believe, and enforce the lies of psychopaths. In order to keep oneself safe, the first thing to do is NOT BELIEVE anything they say. Assume the opposite is true. Then start gathering data, with an emphasis on data from outside the psychopath-approved narrative-creation system.
This heuristic has served me incredibly well. It does not produce perfect knowledge. Indeed, initially it does not produce knowledge at all. What it does is keep me from believing lies. And on that front, its track record for me has been near perfect for the last five or so years—and very much since humanity took our final steps through the looking glass back in 2020.
If they tell you it’s good, it’s probably bad. If they tell you its safe, it’s probably not. If they tell you you should, you probably shouldn’t. If they tell you it works, it probably doesn’t. (And vice-versa, of course.) If they tell you it happened, it probably didn’t—at least not the way, or for the reasons, they claim.
This doesn’t just apply to medicine. If you had applied this to, say, Russiagate when it first started, you would have been right. You would not have known why you were right—and it took several years for all the facts to finally come out proving that you were right—but you still would have been right. The same thing is happening now as the J6 footage has come out and that narrative is unraveling. Masks…the vaccine…lockdowns…the risk of covid to children…
Start every day by remembering that just about everything they say is a lie.
It’s not an easy way to live. It hurts the heart and soul to be so suspicious. It causes a constant grinding against one’s normalcy bias—a grinding that can be deafening if one’s normalcy bias is high. But it will keep you safe. It will keep you, as Vaclav Havel said, “Living within the truth” rather than “Living within the lie.”
And truth is worth the pain.
I do not pretend to understand anything more than the very surface level of this study, so I could have gotten something wrong. But I don’t think so.
According to Figure 4. here, Pfizer also refused an independent trial of the drug: https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/I-CARE-Early-COVID-Protocol.pdf
Excellent, excellent article! On board 100+%